A jury in Santa Fe, New Mexico, has found that Meta Platforms misled state residents about Facebook’s handling of user data and some of its policies on harmful content.

The case arose from allegations connected to Cambridge Analytica, which obtained information from millions of Facebook users through a third-party application without their consent.

Jurors concluded that 26 of 29 statements identified by the state were misleading, including claims concerning data practices, hate speech and misinformation.

Meta rejected the verdict and said it would continue defending its record, arguing that users receive controls over their information and that the company protects free expression.

A judge will determine the financial consequences after jurors found more than 43 million violations; New Mexico law allows civil penalties of up to $5,000 for each violation.

The state also plans to request operational changes, potentially including corrections to earlier statements and an audit of how the company manages personal data.

The verdict adds to growing legal pressure on major technology platforms to explain data-sharing practices clearly and demonstrate that public promises match internal systems.

Source: Reuters, 25 September 2026.

Featured photo: dole777 via Unsplash.